It has been brought to my attention that there is a supposed "typo" in one of our strategy segments. Let me be clear: I will not allow my team to take shortcuts when it comes to your, the reader's, experience at Gombler. It was suggested that we "simply fix" this typo. No. That is a shortcut. Surely an announcement containing a convoluted explanation as to why this is an acceptable quality level is the longer path of which many shorter paths may "cut" to a resolution. Furthermore, who are we to declare that these depots are not supple? Perhaps this was the author's intention and the fact that these supple depots provide supply is merely coincidental! If I were a zergling would I attack a depot made of a material so supple? Would I even know what supple actually means outside of a relatively socially acceptable compliment to a woman's bosom?
Henceforth and hitherto, all supple supply depots shall be interchangeably known as either descriptor, but not sans descriptor. That wouldn't do.
Nathan Jackson
